Acknowledgements
It is a great honor for me to present the Baseline Assessment Report on drugs and alcohol use, 2022 for Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), which provides the findings of prevalence of drug and substance use in the Service. The protocol of the assessment was developed with inputs from all stakeholders and requisite clearances obtained from relevant authorities. This assessment was conducted through a participatory process, ethical considerations and approvals obtained from the Ethics and Scientific Review Committee and embracing best practices with support from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), together with a dedicated team from KWS Alcohol & Drug Abuse Committee and the Technical Working Group who were trained with the help of UNODC consultants.
Vulnerability to drug use is a complex social phenomenon which requires concerted efforts from all stakeholders to address intrinsic challenges. As an organization, we cannot afford to turn a blind eye to substance use because invariable this has an impact on the organization’s sustainable productivity and social well-being of our staff. Alcohol and drug use has a direct effect on organizational productivity as it undermines achievement of set goals through loss of skills and diversion of financial resources to procure drugs, treatment and rehabilitation. Invariably this has a negative impact on both the organization and affected staff who are likely to sink into poverty and hopelessness.
We are optimistic that this baseline assessment will assist the Service to identify the right measures to develop and implement a response to prevent drug use in the Service. Our common aim is to attain zero prevalence of drug use, thus adding to the development and wellbeing of employees, and raising awareness by educating them to make informed and responsible decisions in their own lives.
On my own behalf and that of management, I wish to thank the entire KWS Technical Working Group that undertook the survey. I also treasure the collaborative support received from UNODC for their technical support and financial assistance. We are confident that the assessment findings and recommendations will be valuable assets towards developing KWS strategy on drugs and substances use prevention which will further guide us in addressing the menace of drug use with much more scientific approach.

Dr. Erustus Kanga
Director General
Kenya Wildlife Service
Sample Characteristics
Participants were provided the option to respond or not respond to any of the questions therefore all data is based on voluntary contributions.

Age
1,387 ParticipantsEmployee background
characteristics (Age)
based classification

Sex
1,391 ParticipantsEmployee background
characteristics (Sex)
based classification

Cadre
1,378 ParticipantsEmployee background
characteristics (Cadre)
based classification

Marital Status
1,390 ParticipantsEmployee background
characteristics (Marital Status)
based classification

Highest Education
1,389 ParticipantsEmployee background
characteristics (Highest Education)
based classification

Employment Length
1,388 ParticipantsEmployee background
characteristics (Employment Length)
based classification
Usage of drugs

Life time
usage of drugs
1,562Participants

Current
usage of drugs
900Participants
Relationship between usage of alcohol and characteristics
There is a significant relationship between sex and use of alcohol. Men are more likely than women to consume alcohol | X2 (40, N= 1,399) =4,284.168, p = .000 |
There is a significant relationship between age and use of alcohol | X2 (35, N= 1,399) =4,213.059, p = .001 |
There is a significant relationship between education level and use of alcohol | X2 (40, N= 1,399) =4,214.479, p = .000 |
There is a significant relationship between marital status and use of alcohol | X2 (30, N= 1,399) =72.349, p = .001 |
There is a significant relationship between job cadre and use of alcohol | X2 (35, N= 1,399) =4,208.794, p = .001 |
Effects of alcohol and drug abuse among employees
There is a significant relationship between absenteeism and current alcohol use. Those who consumed alcohol are more likely to be absent than those who did not identify as having consumed alcohol in the past year. job cadre and use of alcohol. X2 (25, N= 1383) =4205.610, p = .000.
There is a significant relationship between visiting a health facility because of an illness and current alcohol use. Those who consumed alcohol are more likely to visit a health facility than those who did not identify as having consumed alcohol in the past year. X2 (25, N= 1381) = 4205.417, p = .000.
There is a significant relationship between receiving a warning from a supervisor and current alcohol use. Those who consumed alcohol are more likely to receive a warning from a supervisor than those who did not identify as having consumed alcohol in the past year. X2 (25, N= 1383) = 4231.839, p = .001.
There is a significant relationship between reporting to work late and current alcohol use. Those who consumed alcohol are more likely to report to work late than those who did not identify as having consumed alcohol in the past year. X2 (25, N= 1382) = 4205.238, p = .000.
This section explores the extent of alcohol, drugs, and substance abuse in the families and how they may impact on employees’ performance. According to NACADA Baseline Assessment Guidelines (2020), past studies have shown that employees with family members who abuse substances are less productive in the workplace.
Of those who completed the survey assessment, 41% of the respondents reported that a member of the family is using drugs and/or alcohol. Within this group, 27.7% (n=388) indicated that the drug or alcohol use affects their work performance, 41.7%(n=583) indicated that it does not affect their work performance, and 4.8% (n=67) reported that they are not sure whether the family member’s drug or alcohol use affects their work performance.
Drug and Alcohol levels
When asked “How would you describe the level of harmful alcohol and drug use in the organization”, survey respondents (n= 1357), the majority of respondents reported Moderate (35.7%) to High (24.5%).
Alcohol use disorders
It is known that not everyone who is using alcohol develops an alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, a certain proportion of users will develop problematic use of alcohol. The NACADA Baseline Assessment Guidelines (2020) includes questions based upon the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) as a screening tool to identify employees with alcohol use disorders. Accordingly, the DSM-V recognizes substance related disorders resulting from the use of ten separate classes of drugs: alcohol, caffeine, cannabis, hallucinogens, stimulants, tobacco, and other substances.
As noted, the following eleven standard criteria are normally used to identify substance use disorders.
- Taking the substance in larger amounts or for longer than the individual meant to.
- Wanting to cut down or stop using the substance but not managing to.
- Spending a lot of time getting, using, or recovering from use of the substance.
- Cravings and urges to use the substance.
- Not managing to do what the individual should at work, home, or school, because of substance use.
- Continuing to use, even when it causes problems in relationships.
- Giving up important social, occupational, or recreational activities because of substance use.
- Using substances again and again, even when it puts the individual in danger.
- Continuing to use, even when the individual knows he or she has a physical or psychological problem that could have been caused or made worse by the substance.
- Needing more of the substance to get the effect that he or she wants (tolerance).
- Development of withdrawal symptoms, which can be relieved by taking more of the substance.
Questions associated with the DSM-V screening tool were included in the survey assessment to categorize severity of substance use disorders depending on how many symptoms were identified: 2-3 symptoms indicate a mild substance use disorder, 4-5 symptoms indicates a moderate substance use disorder, and 6 or more symptoms indicates a severe substance use disorder. 19.7% (n= 275) of the total respondents (N=1399) reported that they consumed alcohol in the past year.
Of this subset, as reported in Table X, more than one-third of all KWS respondents scored symptoms indicating a severe substance use disorder, approximately half of the subset scored no or mild substance use disorder, and11% of the group reported symptoms indicating moderate substance use disorder.
34% (n=93) | 1 or fewer symptoms | |
Mild substance use disorder | 17.5% (n=48) | 2-3 symptoms |
Moderate substance use disorder | 11% (n=31) | 4-5 symptoms |
Severe substance use disorder | 37.5% (n=103) | 6 or more symptoms |
(n=1,013) Employee reported to work while drunk
(n=993) Awareness of Drugs & Alcohol use activities
(n=893) Not seen any messages on alcohol & drugs
(n=912) Aware about counselling and trainings
Attend employee training/sensitization on Alcohol & drug use
Employee perception of the organization’s support of alcohol and drug use
Drug and Alcohol Use-related knowledge and attitudes
Disagree | Not sure | Agree | |
---|---|---|---|
Alcohol & drug use is a private affair and should not be addressed at workplace. | 53% (742) |
3.7% (52) |
28.9% (405) |
People who perform poorly due to their drug use should be dismissed. | 70.7% (989) |
5.2% (73) |
11.3% (158) |
Addiction is a disease like any other and people with SUD should be assisted in every way. | 3.8% (53) |
2.8% (39) |
81.5% (1,140) |
Our organization should have a resident counselor trained on addiction to help people who use substances receive help. | 1.8% (25) |
2.0% (28) |
85.8% (1,200) |
Knowledge

Colleague with
a Drug and Alcohol
use problem
931 Participants

Treatment and
rehabilitation
facility
691 Participants
Effects of alcohol and drug use among employees
9 out of 10 employees, who acknowledge having consumed alcohol in the past year, meet the criteria for excessive alcohol consumption, as measured by the number of drinks per day or per week, and by volume of alcohol consumed.
There were few reported cases of employees’ maladaptive behavior associated with the use of substances such as of khat, tobacco products (sheesha, kuber, and cigarettes), and cannabis. More so, it was reported that supervisors often provide these substances so that rangers can work longer hours without fatigue.
Respondents acknowledge the role of supervisory leadership, sharing of information, and understanding of the officers’ needs as key components towards building a culture of health and wellness. This was particularly noted with regards to family obligations, leave time, and mid-school year duty station transfers. KWS supervisors also noted the need for additional leadership training and support.
Respondents were not satisfied with the level of intervention, prevention, and support offered. For the most part, participants stated that they did not have access to counselors Participants stated that stated that the current manner in which individuals are removed from the station – without necessarily their knowledge of the reason - There were positive responses regarding the importance of Leadership, Psychological, and Spiritual Counseling, and Family Systems to effectuate intervention and treatment. Importantly, there was an acknowledgment that intervention and treatment changes behavior.
Respondents demonstrate an inability to communicate with their superiors. There is a widespread level of distrust in supervisory leadership, lack of consistent processes, and expectations that contribute to officers’ alcohol and substance use. Moreover, supervisors identified generational differences in communication with younger officers, especially as this relates to their belief and commitment for advancement in KWS.
Respondents explained that there is a lack of consistency in the advancement and promotional processes. Transfer and promotion do not necessarily follow the posted civil service requirements. For those individuals who are in recovery or abusing substances, many times they are transferred to a remote or conflict area. In sum, the problem is transferred to another station. Inconsistency in transfer, advancement and promotion compound feelings of social isolation, depression, and lack of motivation, and contribute to substance abuse.
Participants indicated that the denial of scheduled leave time and the related lack of opportunity to engage in positive social, familial, behavioral, and physical activities contributes to alcohol and substance use.
It is natural to assume that there is a level of tension between the individual’s behavior while off duty and the demands placed on police officers to “report at a moment’s notice” or to have their shift extended. However, participants reported a level of concern for their personal safety and the safety of the community when a co-worker reports to work while intoxicated. Moreover, the sober individual is held accountable by his/her supervisor for the harmful behavior of the intoxicated co-worker. These concerns were magnified because a number of ‘drivers’ come to work intoxicated.
Officers have a measurable exposure to trauma and it falls to the organization to determine how to address individuals who are experiencing both stress and trauma. Participants report very little support from supervision and management, there is the somewhat contradictory opinion that officers should handle trauma experienced by the respondent without the help of others.
Patterns and consequences of alcohol and substance use consumption varied by sex of the respondent. The most common reason given by both male and female respondents is that women refrain from use or misuse because they have greater responsibilities to take care of their children and their families. Importantly, it was also noted that female employees – whether working in the bush or in an administrative office role - stated that they are at a greater risk of harm for gender-based violence from an intoxicated colleague or supervisor. In sum, duty assignment by gender is an important concern.